Merci om me te corrigeren. Maar dan blijft dit:Stand-your-ground law - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
A stand-your-ground law (sometimes called "line in the sand" or "no duty to retreat" law) provides that people may use deadly force when they reasonably believe it to be necessary to defend against certain violent crimes (right of self-defense). Under such a law, people have no duty to retreat before using deadly force in self-defense, so long as they are in a place where they are lawfully present.
Whether a jurisdiction follows stand-your-ground or duty-to-retreat is just one element of its self-defense laws. Different jurisdictions allow deadly force against different crimes. All American states allow it against deadly force, great bodily injury, and likely kidnapping or rape; some also allow it against threat of robbery and burglary.
Dus lijkt in sommige staten wel legaal te zijn, aangezien in elkaar geklopt worden door drie man met een hersenschudding imo wel onder great bodily injury zou kunnen vallen.
Er zal wrsch nog wel een vorm van proces of hoe dat daar ook verloopt volgen, maar met waarschijnlijke vrijspraak tot gevolg
"A 2020 RAND Corporation review of existing research concluded that "There is supportive evidence that stand-your-ground laws are associated with increases in firearm homicides and moderate evidence that they increase the total number of homicides."[3]"
en belangrijk voor het principe van "ik schiet wel":
"A Texas A&M study found that when whites use the stand-your-ground defense against black attackers they are more successful than when blacks use the defense against white attackers.[35] A paper from The Urban Institute which analysed FBI data found that in stand-your-ground states, the use of the defense by whites in the shooting of a black person is found to be justifiable 17 percent of the time, while the defense when used by blacks in the shooting of a white person is successful 1 percent of the time.[35][36] In non-stand-your-ground states, the shooting of a black person by a white is found justified approximately 9 percent of the time, while the shooting of a white person by a black is found justified approximately 1 percent of the time.[35][36]"
Los van het verschil tussen rassen, is het percentage waar men het succesvol gebruikt blijkbaar niet zo groot (wat natuurlijk ook kan betekenen dat het random gebruikt wordt, dat weet ik ook).