9/11 could not have been an inside job because:
THEY'RE MUCH TOO INCOMPETENT! Give me a break. This is easily The Most Incompetent Administration in American History™, if not galactic history. The admnistration's tragicomic ineptness is a black hole at the center of the conspiracist paradigm. (Just a metaphor to throw them off.)
THEY WOULD NEVER DARE! They are also far too cowardly--the right are cowardly. They're mean...but mean is not tough. They talk tough...but that's not "tough" either. This incredibly corrupt, unelected administration would not DARE pull off the bold subterfuge the conspiracists imagine. I know this because God told me all of this. At least I think it was God. It sure as hell came on like God, I tell you what.
THEY WOULD NEVER HAVE CLOSED DOWN WALL STREET! It makes NO SENSE that the bad guys would deliberately bring off a plan that brought down Wall Street. Much the conspiracist paradigm sounds like a bad comic book, or a script that no real scriptwriter would ever submit. The monied conspirators would not allow Wall Street to shut down--not for a minute. They would have sent the planes somewhere else, I'm quite sure of it. Notice how the administration was wetting their pants about getting Wall Street going again. They told New Yorkers the air was safe, even though the air was hazardous. Besides proving them treasonous criminals, this proves they didn't engineer 9/11. Now get another life.
THEY WOULD NEVER HIT THE NERVE CENTER OF THEIR OWN MILITARY. In the same vein, I doubt the "sadistic control freaks" who are bringing off this plan would allow a blow to their own defensive control center. Here again, the conspiracy story is completely inane. The conspiracist paradigm alleges a lot of egotism & arrogance on the part of the perpetrators. But egotistic, arrogant control freaks would not want to look lame. The attack on the Pentagon made the administration & the whole U.S. military look lame--consistent with what militant Muslims would want to achieve.
THE PRESIDENT WENT INTO BRAINLOCK. He infamously sat there for something like seven minutes––while the country was under attack! My children...if the guy had known about it, he would not have just sat there! The people who engineered the attacks would have arranged to make the President look good, you understand? It was their caper; they would not let their guy just sit there looking dumb. So it was not an inside job, you see?
***INTERMISSION***
Adjust your tin hats.
THE ADMINISTRATION FLEW MEMBERS OF THE BIN LADEN FAMILY OUT OF THE U.S. RIGHT AFTER 9/11. Alex Jones & other conspiracy guys cite this as evidence of a conspiracy. But it does just the opposite. Consider: if the government had been behind 9/11, they would have gotten the Bin Ladens out of America BEFORE 9/11. So once again: it was obviously not a conspiracy. This also proves that conspiracy people are dumb.
SADDAM WOULDA DONE IT! We now know the Bush junta was keen on invading Iraq. They tied themselves into knots deceiving the country about Saddam Hussein's alleged connection to the plot. It's clear they wanted to use 9/11 to get into Iraq. But this points away from the "inside job" scenario, if you think about it. Had the government planned & executed 9/11, they would have framed Hassan for it from the get-go. Since conspiracists say Saddam is a CIA puppet, the perps would almost certainly have had Saddam pull off the job, or at least confess to having pulled off the job. More proof conspiracy guys are dumb, as we all suspected.
THE GOVERNMENT PREDICTED MORE TERROR ATTACKS AFTER 9/11...& THEY DID NOT HAPPEN. The same might be said for Alex Jones & the other conspiracy buffs. Like the government, the conspiracists predicted lots more domestic terror in the U.S.A. after 9/11...& it never happened. You see the implication of this, I'm sure. If the government brought off 9/11, they would have brought off follow-up attacks as bad as the ones they themselves had predicted. Empty threats would be poor strategy for the perps.
THERE WAS TOO MUCH "PRIOR KNOWLEDGE." Alex Jones & his mates go on about "prior knowledge," without understanding that the existence of all that prior knowledge tends to disprove their theory. It's like this: if you are engineering a hoax, you don't want your own people barraging you with warnings about the job you yourself are trying to pull. The perps would arrange for almost no instances of "prior knowledge." So 9/11 was not a government plot. What can I say?
THERE WERE ALL THOSE FAKE TERROR ALERTS. Alex Jones points out that the administration seemed to be using fake terror alerts to manipulate the people. Who woulda thought? But this, too, strongly suggests there was no conspiracy. Why would they cook up phoney alerts, based on 4-year-old data, when they could cook up fresh terror? Answer: they wouldn't.
THERE ARE TOO MANY HOLES IN THE "COVER STORY." Once again, you'll notice my mind goes in the opposite direction from the conspiracy guys'. They're the ones poking the holes, after all. But here's how I figure it. If you're planning a hoax, you work very hard on that cover story. Your cover story is the whole point of your subterfuge, right? You want that story to be as seamless as can be. The bad guys would not, for example, have tried to fake a crash into the Pentagon...then forgotten to leave out bodies & debris. The imagined perps are said to be very clever. They therefore could not have been so inept as to FORGET to leave the bodies & wreckage! This gets us into "bad comic book" territory again, as well as bolstering our suspicions that conspiracy people are just basically dim. Not that we don't love them.
So every time the conspiracy people find a "hole," it actually suggests it was not a conspiracy.
http://perrylogan.org/
