Archief - Opnieuw poging tot terreur verijdeld

Het archief is een bevroren moment uit een vorige versie van dit forum, met andere regels en andere bazen. Deze posts weerspiegelen op geen enkele manier onze huidige ideeën, waarden of wereldbeelden en zijn op sommige plaatsen gecensureerd wegens ontoelaatbaar. Veel zijn in een andere tijdsgeest gemaakt, al dan niet ironisch - zoals in het ironische subforum Off-Topic - en zouden op dit moment niet meer gepost (mogen) worden. Toch bieden we dit archief nog graag aan als informatiedatabank en naslagwerk. Lees er hier meer over of start een gesprek met anderen.

Bacon

Legacy Member
Grappig hoe je vervalt in dezelfde rethoriek om jezelf te blijven overtuigen, skepticisme zonder open geest = blind.

En ik probeerde je nog zo te waarschuwen...

Project Loony

Legacy Member
Bacon zei:
Grappig hoe je vervalt in dezelfde rethoriek om jezelf te blijven overtuigen, skepticisme zonder open geest = blind.
Ra ra, wat doe jij de hele tijd?

Peephole

Legacy Member
Bacon zei:
Grappig hoe je vervalt in dezelfde rethoriek om jezelf te blijven overtuigen, skepticisme zonder open geest = blind.

En ik probeerde je nog zo te waarschuwen...
Ach geef gewoon toe dat je het onderspit moet delven.

Bacon

Legacy Member
Het is precies die instelling die je blind maakt voor de feiten, jij denkt dat het om winnen of verliezen gaat ;)

Bacon

Legacy Member
Jim Marrs @ DallasStorm: From JFK to 9/11
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5058355118709441276&q=dallasstorm

[BRussels Tribunal] Klaar voor de nieuwe wereldorde ?
http://indymedia.all2all.org/news/2004/04/83783.php

"They rediscover bin Laden every two years right before the election. If you had a business strategy that worked all the time that was premised on scaring the living daylights out of people, you just keep doing it."

-- Bill Clinton, in an interview on Bloomberg Television's Political Capital with Al Hunt, about the Republican strategy for the midterm elections.


Me: I would imagine that security procedures are different now than they were prior to 9/11, so I don't think you would be revealing any confidential information by answering this question. I have heard that, as of 9/11, the anti-aircraft batteries were automated, in other words, that they would have automatically fired against any incoming aircraft that did not transmit the appropriate friend or foe signal. Is that true?

AG: Yes that is true. They are either to attempt to guide the incoming aircraft that has violated the airspace to a safe location to land. Making reasonable effort to guide it down. Or shoot it down.
http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2006/07/interview-with-april-gallop.html

Legatus

Legacy Member
nwo=illuminatie=globalisering...
het gebeurd.

enige vraag is wat is de beweegrede? good or evil ? of tussenin.

Bacon

Legacy Member
Losing a War, Winning a Police State
The New York Times disclosure of an official National Intelligence Estimate, which states that the Iraq invasion has worsened the global terrorist threat, carries an unspoken subtext – that the Bush administration is either woefully ignorant of how to combat terrorism or finds the terrorist threat a useful tool for managing the American public.

http://www.consortiumnews.com/2006/092606a.html

Rushing Off a Cliff
Last week, the White House and three Republican senators announced a terrible deal on this legislation that gave Mr. Bush most of what he wanted, including a blanket waiver for crimes Americans may have committed in the service of his antiterrorism policies. Then Vice President Dick Cheney and his willing lawmakers rewrote the rest of the measure so that it would give Mr. Bush the power to jail pretty much anyone he wants for as long as he wants without charging them, to unilaterally reinterpret the Geneva Conventions, to authorize what normal people consider torture, and to deny justice to hundreds of men captured in error.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/28/o...b3b23c27944ff9&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

George Bush's vast new powers of detention and interrogation
Final passage of the torture/detention bill was 65-34. Without necessarily planning in advance to do so, I live-blogged the Senate proceedings here (if you're going to subject yourself to something as unpleasant as watching U.S. Senators "debate" a bill to give the U.S. President the powers of torture and indefinite detention, it's much healthier to have an outlet when doing so).

http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/2006/09/george-bushs-vast-new-powers-of.html

Decimating the Constitution with Military Tribunals
Given all the glorification being bestowed on three U.S. senators for displaying “principle” in standing against President Bush’s plan to amend the Geneva Convention to permit torture of detainees, followed by their quick compromise abandoning any semblance of principle, it is easy to lose sight of something much bigger: The military tribunals that the president and the Congress are set to approve will constitute the most radical, dangerous, and disgraceful transformation in the U.S. criminal-justice system since our nation’s inception.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/hornberger/hornberger101.html

Wiretap Bill Moves Closer to Passage
Last-minute changes to legislation authorizing the National Security Agency's warrantless wiretapping program have won the support of three balking Senate Republicans, improving the chances that a bill expanding the Bush administration's surveillance authority will pass Congress this week.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...92501021.html?nav=rss_politics/administration


the move to Iran:

Military official: Iranian millions funding insurgency
BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- A Shiite Muslim militia involved in the warfare between Sunni and Shiites in Iraq has received "millions of dollars" and an assortment of weaponry from Iran, a senior U.S. military official says.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/09/28/iraq.iran/index.html

Bacon

Legacy Member
Torture Bill States Non-Allegiance To Bush Is Terrorism
Buried amongst the untold affronts to the Bill of Rights, the Constitution and the very spirit of America, the torture bill contains a definition of "wrongfully aiding the enemy" which labels all American citizens who breach their "allegiance" to President Bush and the actions of his government as terrorists subject to possible arrest, torture and conviction in front of a military tribunal.

Subsection 4(b) (26) of section 950v. of HR 6166 - Crimes triable by military commissions - includes the following definition.

"Any person subject to this chapter who, in breach of an allegiance or duty to the United States, knowingly and intentionally aids an enemy of the United States, or one of the co-belligerents of the enemy, shall be punished as a military commission under this chapter may direct."

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/infowarsnews/message/1085
Het archief is een bevroren moment uit een vorige versie van dit forum, met andere regels en andere bazen. Deze posts weerspiegelen op geen enkele manier onze huidige ideeën, waarden of wereldbeelden en zijn op sommige plaatsen gecensureerd wegens ontoelaatbaar. Veel zijn in een andere tijdsgeest gemaakt, al dan niet ironisch - zoals in het ironische subforum Off-Topic - en zouden op dit moment niet meer gepost (mogen) worden. Toch bieden we dit archief nog graag aan als informatiedatabank en naslagwerk. Lees er hier meer over of start een gesprek met anderen.
Terug
Bovenaan