Archief - The Great Global Warming Swindle

Fighting Hobbit zei:

In de opwarming speelt het stijgend CO2 gehalte inderdaad de grootste rol,

Klik om te vergroten...

jormund zei:

maar om toch eens te vitten, nee het is daar geen 1000 graden, zelfs geen 400, een 200 is mss mogelijk, maar nog niet gemeten, de energie die nodig is om superdicht water waar zo verschrikkelijk veel druk op staat op te warmen is onvoorstelbaar hoog, maar soit.

Klik om te vergroten...

er bestaan geen wezens die 1000 graden aankunnen, uw geheugen is idd nogal los, ge hebt wrs honderd gehoord, sommige bacteriën, hyperthermophylae, hebben een ideale delingstemperatuur van 80 tot 105 graden, maar die zijn superzeldzaam. Het hoogst wat ooit gemeten is waaronder zo'n bacterie even kan overleven is 121 graden, maar dan nog wordt hun dna zeer zwaar beschadigd. normale wezens kunnen zich wel aanpassen, maar eens boven de 60 graden gaat elk meercellig wezen doodgaan, het is niet omdat die visjes rond die vulkanische plekken leven dat ze direct erboven kunnen overleven he

Klik om te vergroten...

Oldskooler zei:

mhah, juist the inconvenient truth gezien (zat bij de humo)

wel belgië zal precies van de kaart verdwijnen

Klik om te vergroten...

Terrorist_Hell zei:

Nu is het zelfs zo dat ze reclame maken voor die film van Gore, je krijgt de DVD gratis bij een bepaald magazine en dergelijke.Met als doel de officiële variant van het verhaal als waarheid te doen aanzien, en iedereen de mond te snoeren en/of te ridiculiseren die het durft in twijfel te trekken, net zoals bij 9/11.

Klik om te vergroten...

Terrorist_Hell zei:

dit is realiteit hé mensen, hier in België valt dat best mee, maar in de UK of USA worden groepen massaal de mond gesnoerd of de gevangenis ingedraaid omdat ze twijfelen aan het officiële verhaal.

Klik om te vergroten...

Terrorist_Hell zei:

Er zullen meer en meer regels (o.a. taxen) omtrent gasuitstoot komen, opnieuw plichten voor de mensheid.

Klik om te vergroten...

Terrorist_Hell zei:

Newsletter van David Icke op dit 'fenomeen'.

Klik om te vergroten...

IF THIS MAN TELLS YOU SOMETHING ... (foto Gore) ... IT'S NOT TRUE ...

First of all, anything Al Gore wants you to believe comes straight from the Hidden Hand because he is a long time front man for the agenda of global control. Bush may be the current focus of hostility for those who challenge the gathering Orwellian nightmare, but the Illuminati work through all sides to dictate the outcome and the 'good guy'/'bad guy' approach is a common technique.

...

If Gore was the honest and decent man he portrays himself to be, the Clintons' would not have let him past the guards on the gate let alone into their satanic lair. And I do mean satanic - literally. A former Satanist connected to the Rothschild family told me:"President Clinton has "full blown" multiple personality disorder and is an active sorcerer in the Satanic mystery religions. This is true of Al Gore, as well; I have known Misters Clinton and Gore from our childhood as active and effective Satanists."

...

For those who haven't read my books, multiple personality disorder means 'mind-controlled' and this is far from the only insider who has told me of being with Clinton and Gore at sacrifice rituals. Gore was brought up to serve the cause of human enslavement and he is just another bloodline pimp. He is a cousin of the late President Richard Nixon and a descendant of England's Edward I with direct links to the Holy Roman Empire through Emperors Louis II, Charles II and Louis I. This makes him yet another descendant of Charlemagne in American politics and a cousin of George W. Bush,

http://www.consciousmedianetwork.com/media/DAVID_ICKE_NEWSLETTER.pdf

Klik om te vergroten...

Peephole zei:

Wie wordt er de mond gesnoerd en wie wordt er onterecht geridiculiseerd? ? Anti-bewegingen die het officiële verhaal van Gore in twijfel trekken / willen discussiëren en staven met bewijs

Wat is het officiële verhaal? Film van Gore
Waarom mogen Al Gore en Humo zich niet inzetten voor de goede zaak? Omdat het propaganda is en er wetten zullen komen die de vrijheid van mens zullen inperken. Heb je die nieuwsletter trouwens gelezen?
Wat is net zoals 9/11?Het opsluiten/ridiculiseren van anti-bewegingsgroepen die aan het officiële verhaal twijfelen + het propaganderen ervan.
Wat is uw plan? Niks doen?Dat weet ik (nog) niet.

Klik om te vergroten...

Peephole zei:

Dude, als dit niet genoeg is om in te zien dat Icke een krankzinnige mongool is dan ben je er zelf één.

Klik om te vergroten...

Terrorist_Hell zei:

Newsletter van David Icke op dit 'fenomeen'. Nu is het zelfs zo dat ze reclame maken voor die film van Gore, je krijgt de DVD gratis bij een bepaald magazine en dergelijke. Met als doel de officiële variant van het verhaal als waarheid te doen aanzien, en iedereen de mond te snoeren en/of te ridiculiseren die het durft in twijfel te trekken, net zoals bij 9/11.

edit: dit is realiteit hé mensen, hier in België valt dat best mee, maar in de UK of USA worden groepen massaal de mond gesnoerd of de gevangenis ingedraaid omdat ze twijfelen aan het officiële verhaal. Er zullen meer en meer regels (o.a. taxen) omtrent gasuitstoot komen, opnieuw plichten voor de mensheid. Gelieve geen idiote boodschappen te posten over Icke aub, dit gaat over de bewijslast, niet over het geloof.

Klik om te vergroten...

_DM_ zei:

Oh piss off, gelooft ge dat nu zelf ?
En waarom zouden we geen commentaar mogen geven op Icke ?

Klik om te vergroten...

_DM_ zei:

Schizofrenie is hem ook niet onbekend denk ik, Gore is een leugenaar maar Icke is wel lid van de Green Party...

Klik om te vergroten...

Terrorist_Hell zei:

Het enige waar jij nu commentaar op geeft, is zijn credibiliteit, niet de bewijslast. Jij vindt het amusant om met zulke zaken te lachen terwijl je nooit erover hebt gelezen. Soit, da's jouw zaak, maar maak een ander daarom niet belachelijk.

9/11 anti-bewegingen worden wel degelijk vaak opgesloten, terwijl 'freedom of speech' nochtans een grondwet is. Idem bij die global warming zaak.

Gelieve de thread proper te houden en geen commentaar te leveren op Icke zelf, maar op de bewijslast. Dit gaat niet om geloof of hoe een persoon wordt geïnterpreteerd zoals een bende kleine kinderen hier doen (en die dan met grote woorden gaan gooien in hun pleidooien), aangezien dat subjectief is. Als ik nog meer idioot en subjectief commentaar krijg, verwijder ik me bij deze van de thread en discussieer ik wel met andere (verstandige) mensen, ik ga niet continu zitten badposten omdat het offtopic of flame betreft.

Klik om te vergroten...

Bacon zei:

Het is overduidelijk dat (ook) mensen met macht zich aan "occulte" praktijken schuldig maken, of dat nu satanisme of 'sirus worshipping' is, feit is dat ze het doen, vraag is wat voor belang het heeft.

Maar het afdoen als onzin is puur onwetendheid imo.

Klik om te vergroten...

Icke newsletter zei:

A former Satanist connected to the Rothschild family told me:"President Clinton has "full blown" multiple personality disorder and is an active sorcerer in the Satanic mystery religions. This is true of Al Gore, as well; I have known Misters Clinton and Gore from our childhood as active and effective Satanists."

Klik om te vergroten...

Terrorist_Hell zei:

Gelieve de thread proper te houden en geen commentaar te leveren op Icke zelf, maar op de bewijslast.

Klik om te vergroten...

Reptieldude zei:

Christopher Landsea, Science and Operations Officer at the U.S. National Hurricane Center, resigned from the IPCC because he said: 'I personally cannot in good faith continue to contribute to a process that I view as both being motivated by pre-conceived agendas and being scientifically unsound'.

http://www.consciousmedianetwork.com/media/DAVID_ICKE_NEWSLETTER.pdf

Klik om te vergroten...

Reptieldude zei:

We are told that the earth is now warmer than at any time since records began. That may be true, but when did the records start? A BBC report in early 2007 said the year was predicted to be the 'warmest since records began' ... in 1914. Other global records apparently go back to ... 1860. What the hell does that tell us when the planetary cycles can be measured in hundreds, thousands, tens of thousands, even millions of years??

http://www.consciousmedianetwork.com/media/DAVID_ICKE_NEWSLETTER.pdf

Klik om te vergroten...

Reptieldude zei:

A study by a team at Harvard University of some 240 scientific reports showed that today's temperatures are far from the highest in the last thousand years and nor are we experiencing the most extreme weather patterns. The team studied data on what are called 'temperature proxies' like tree rings, ice cores and historical accounts and their findings were published in the journal, Energy and Environment. They found there had been a Medieval Warm Period between the 9th and 14th centuries when global temperatures were significantly higher than today. http://www.consciousmedianetwork.com/media/DAVID_ICKE_NEWSLETTER.pdf

Klik om te vergroten...

MYTH #2: Regional proxy evidence of warm or anomalous (wet or dry) conditions in past centuries contradicts the conclusion that late 20th century hemispheric mean warmth is anomalous in a long-term (multi-century to millennial) context.

Such claims reflect a lack of awareness of the distinction between regional and large-scale climate change. Similar such claims were recently made in two articles by astronomer Willie Soon and co-authors (Soon and Baliunas, 2003; Soon et al, 2003). These claims were subsequently rebutted by a group of more than a dozen leading climate scientists in an article in the journal "Eos" of the American Geophysical Union (Mann et al, ‘Eos‘, 2003). The rebuttal raised, among other points, the following two key points:

(1) In drawing conclusions regarding past regional temperature changes from proxy records, it is essential to assess proxy data for actual sensitivity to past temperature variability. In some cases (Soon and Baliunas, 2003, Soon et al, 2003) a global 'warm anomaly' has been defined for any period during which various regions appear to indicate climate anomalies that can be classified as being either 'warm', 'wet', or 'dry' relative to '20th century' conditions. Such a criterion could be used to define any period of climate as 'warm' or 'cold', and thus cannot meaningfully characterize past large-scale surface temperature changes.

(2) It is essential to distinguish (e.g. by compositing or otherwise assimilating different proxy information in a consistent manner—e.g., Jones et al., 1998; Mann et al., 1998, 1999; Briffa et al., 2001) between regional temperature changes and changes in global or hemispheric mean temperature. Specific periods of cold and warmth differ from region to region over the globe (see Jones and Mann, 2004), as changes in atmospheric circulation over time exhibit a wave-like character, ensuring that certain regions tend to warm (due, for example, to a southerly flow in the Northern Hemisphere winter mid-latitudes) when other regions cool (due to the corresponding northerly flow that must occur elsewhere). Truly representative estimates of global or hemispheric average temperature must therefore average temperature changes over a sufficiently large number of distinct regions to average out such offsetting regional changes. The specification of a warm period, therefore requires that warm anomalies in different regions should be truly synchronous and not merely required to occur within a very broad interval in time, such as AD 800-1300 (as in Soon et al, 2003; Soon and Baliunas, 2003).

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=11

Klik om te vergroten...

Reptieldude zei:

I have written in some of my books about changes happening in the Sun and a study by Swiss and German scientists suggests that climate change can be explained to a large extent by increasing radiation from the Sun. Dr Sami Solanki, the director of the Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research in Gottingen, Germany, who led the research, said: 'The Sun has been at its strongest over the past 60 years and may now be affecting global temperatures. The Sun is in a changed state. It is brighter than it was a few hundred years ago and this brightening started relatively recently - in the last 100 to 150 years.'

...

Dr Solanki said they found that when there were fewer explosions of energy from the Sun, known as sunspots, there was a cooling period on earth and vice-versa. Over the last century the number of sunspots has been increasing and so, therefore, has the temperature. A report in the Daily Telegraph said: 'They found that a dearth of sunspots signalled a cold period - which could last up to 50 years - but that over the past century their numbers had increased as the Earth's climate grew steadily warmer. The scientists also compared data from ice samples collected during an expedition to Greenland in 1991. 'The most recent samples contained the lowest recorded levels of beryllium 10 for more than 1,000 years. Beryllium 10 is a particle created by cosmic rays that decreases in the Earth's atmosphere as the magnetic energy from the Sun increases. Scientists can currently trace beryllium 10 levels back 1,150 years.' The Sun is stimulated vibrationally to produce more intense radiation when we are entering a warm cycle and less when we are starting a cooler period. That's what global warming is - a changing solar energy cycle.

http://www.consciousmedianetwork.com/media/DAVID_ICKE_NEWSLETTER.pdf

Klik om te vergroten...

Did the Sun hit record highs over the last few decades?

The solar influence on climate is a controversial topic in climate research. The irradiance changes are assumed to be relatively small and the importance of potential amplifying mechanisms is still a matter of current debate. One reason for these uncertainties is that there are only approximately 25 years of satellite-based observations of the solar irradiance. Sunspot observations for the last 400 years clearly indicate that current levels of solar activity are very different from the state of the sun during the Maunder minimum (from approx. 1645 to 1715 AD) where almost no sunspots could be observed.

Cosmogenic radionuclides (such as 10Be and 14C) records are the most reliable proxies to extent solar activity reconstructions beyond the period of direct observations of the sun. They are produced in the atmosphere by the interaction of galactic cosmic rays with the atoms of the atmosphere. High solar shielding of the galactic cosmic rays during periods of high solar activity decreases the radionuclide production rates and vice versa for low solar activities. Cosmogenic radionuclide production rates are also influence by the geomagnetic field. Similarly to the solar magnetic modulation, high geomagnetic field intensity decreases the flux of galactic cosmic rays and radionuclide production rates and the opposite for low geomagnetic field intensity.

The processes responsible for the radionuclide production are well known and can be modeled quantitatively. The biggest uncertainties lies in the interpretation of the radionuclide records that can be measured in natural archives such as ice cores in the case of 10Be or tree rings in the case of 14C. This is due to the fact that changes in atmospheric transport and deposition in the case of 10Be or changes in the carbon cycle in the case of 14C can influence the measured concentrations. Unidentified climatic influences lead to errors in the reconstruction of solar activity changes based on these records. This problem is illustrated by two alternative reconstructions of past changes in solar activity based on ice core 10Be records. Based on a 10Be record from Antarctica Bard et al. (2000) conclude that currents levels of solar activity were also reached or exceeded around 1200 AD. By contrast, Solanki et al. (2004) conclude that solar activity during recent decades is exceptionally high compared to the past 8000 years. Their method seems to be confirmed by a 10Be record from Southern Greenland (Dye 3, Beer et al, 1990). However, the two 10Be records from Antarctica and Greenland exhibit big disagreements for the last 55 years which is the main reason for these very different conclusions (Raisbeck and Yiou, 2004).

Obviously, at least one of these records must also be influenced by changes in climate. Since 14C is influenced by completely different geochemical behavior than 10Be, the investigation of 14C records can help to solve the contradictions. Since carbon cycle models allow us to understand past changes in atmospheric CO2 and 13C concentrations it is also possible to use these models to infer the 14C production rate based on measured 14C concentrations in tree rings. Until 1950 AD, when significant amounts of anthropogenic 14C were released into the atmosphere by the nuclear weapons tests, we can calculate the variations in the 14C production rates and infer the solar magnetic modulation from these records. There are uncertainties in connecting the 14C production rate to recent instrumental measurements of solar magnetic modulation (see figure). However, regardless of these uncertainties the conclusions by Usoskin et al. (2003) and Solanki et al. (2004) cannot be confirmed by the analysis of the 14C records (Muscheler et al., 2005). The 14C tree ring records indicate that today’s solar activity is high but not exceptional during the last 1000 years.

Are there additional proxies that could shed light on the solar history? First of all the sunspot record represents a good proxy for solar variations during the last 400 years. While the group sunspot record indicates high solar activity during the last 60 years compared to the preceding 350 years, the Wolf sunspot record reached today’s values for a short period around 1780 AD (with the exception of the very strong sunspot maximum around 1957 AD). Aurora observations also provide information about the history of the sun. However, there are no systematic observations and therefore the conclusions are uncertain. 44Ti measurements in meteorites have the potential to provide high quality estimates of past changes in solar magnetic modulation but, until now, the data are sparse and exhibit large errors (Castagnoli et al., 2003). 36Cl is another useful cosmogenic isotope, but that too has data quality and bomb contamination problems in the modern period. Therefore, it is not yet possible to draw firm conclusions about solar activity changes during the last 400 years based on these data. To conclude, depending on the applied 10Be record different histories of the sun have been inferred. The 14C tree ring record does not confirm the 10Be record from Southern Greenland and the assertion that recent solar activity levels are exceptional. Alternative estimates of the history of the Sun are not yet good enough to be used as independent checks.

Therefore, in the view of the uncertainties and the conflicting data it doesn’t seem to be appropriate to make uncritical and sensational claims about the history of the sun. As long as the differences between the 10Be records are not understood, conclusions based on only one of these records should be treated with caution. Atmospheric 14C concentrations, on the other hand, are much less sensitive to a climate influence during the last 1000 years and, therefore, can provide good estimates of the history of the sun. However, the disagreement between 14C-based solar activity and group sunspot number (Muscheler et al., 2005) should remind us that the variations of the solar activity are not yet completely understood.

Regardless of any discussion about solar irradiance in past centuries, the sunspot record and neutron monitor data (which can be compared with radionuclide records) show that solar activity has not increased since the 1950s and is therefore unlikely to be able to explain the recent warming.

http://www.realclimate.org/index.ph...n-hit-record-highs-over-the-last-few-decades/

Klik om te vergroten...

Terrorist_Hell zei:

Het enige waar jij nu commentaar op geeft, is zijn credibiliteit, niet de bewijslast. Jij vindt het amusant om met zulke zaken te lachen terwijl je nooit erover hebt gelezen. Soit, da's jouw zaak, maar maak een ander daarom niet belachelijk.

9/11 anti-bewegingen worden wel degelijk vaak opgesloten, terwijl 'freedom of speech' nochtans een grondwet is. Idem bij die global warming zaak.

Gelieve de thread proper te houden en geen commentaar te leveren op Icke zelf, maar op de bewijslast. Dit gaat niet om geloof of hoe een persoon wordt geïnterpreteerd zoals een bende kleine kinderen hier doen (en die dan met grote woorden gaan gooien in hun pleidooien), aangezien dat subjectief is. Als ik nog meer idioot en subjectief commentaar krijg, verwijder ik me bij deze van de thread en discussieer ik wel met andere (verstandige) mensen, ik ga niet continu zitten badposten omdat het offtopic of flame betreft.


Hij was lid van de Green Party, maar hij is ervan afgestapt voor bepaalde redenen die je in z'n boeken kunt lezen.

Klik om te vergroten...

Terrorist_Hell zei:

Wie wordt er de mond gesnoerd en wie wordt er onterecht geridiculiseerd?
Anti-bewegingen die het officiële verhaal van Gore in twijfel trekken / willen discussiëren en staven met bewijs

Klik om te vergroten...

Terrorist_Hell zei:

Wat is het officiële verhaal? Film van Gore

Klik om te vergroten...

Terrorist_Hell zei:

Waarom mogen Al Gore en Humo zich niet inzetten voor de goede zaak? Omdat het propaganda is en er wetten zullen komen die de vrijheid van mens zullen inperken.

Klik om te vergroten...

Terrorist_Hell zei:

Wat is uw plan? Niks doen? Dat weet ik (nog) niet.

Klik om te vergroten...

Terrorist_Hell zei:

9/11 anti-bewegingen worden wel degelijk vaak opgesloten, terwijl 'freedom of speech' nochtans een grondwet is. Idem bij die global warming zaak.

Klik om te vergroten...

_DM_ zei:

Gore is een leugenaar

Klik om te vergroten...

night ghost 128 zei:

Hij heeft een paar goede punten, maar die punten zijn wel gekend.

Klik om te vergroten...