Peephole
Legacy Member
Alé, hier gaan we weer.
http://news.scotsman.com/topstories/Election-shows-where-Bones-are.2501726.jp
ITV Host: Just to get this right, you were actually working today on an exercise that envisioned virtually this scenario?
Power: Almost precisely. I was up to 2 o'clock this morning, because it's our job, my own company. Visor Consultants, we specialise in helping people to get their crisis management response. How do you jump from 'slow time' thinking to 'quick time' doing? And we chose a scenario - with their assistance - which is based on a terrorist attack because they're very close to a property occupied by Jewish businessmen, they're in the city, and there are more American banks in the city than there are in the whole of New York - a logical thing to do.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKvkhe3rqtc
Een iet of wat gelijkaardige oefening van een privé-bedrijf dus.
...
A plan was developed to reestablish OEM's functions at an alternate EOC located in the library of the Police Academy on East 20th Street, but this space was quickly outgrown. Because Pier 92 had already been set up for the September 12 exercise, OEM staff members moved there and quickly converted the space into a large EOC adequate to support the complex tasks of managing the nation's largest catastrophic building collapse. In 31 hours, OEM staff had a functional facility just over 4 miles north-northwest of the WTC.
http://transweb.sjsu.edu/mtiportal/research/publications/documents/Sept11.book.htm#pgfId-1010248
Een oefening gepland voor de volgende dag die hun heeft toegelaten hun reddingswerkzaamheden beter te organiseren. Evil.
http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/p... Did & Did Not Cause It - Revised 3-31-08.pdf
PROTEC COMMENT: No they didn’t. It’s the “where.”
When discussing similarities between the towers’ collapse and an explosive demolition, many people overlook the single question most central to any objective investigation. It is not “how” or “when” the buildings failed, but “where” they failed. That answer holds the key to understanding almost everything that occurred at Ground Zero.
Since their inception in the late 1800s, blasting engineers have understood that building implosions work best when the forces of gravity are maximized. This is why blasters always concentrate their efforts on the lowest floors of a structure. While smaller supplemental charges can be placed on upper floors to facilitate breakage and maximize control as the structure collapses, every implosion ever performed has followed the basic model of obliterating structural supports on the bottom few floors first, “to get the structure moving.”
This was not the case with the collapse of Towers 1 and 2. Close examination of these events from every video and photographic angle available does not indicate failure originating from the lowest floors, rather clearly shows each building beginning to fail at precisely the point where the respective planes struck. That is, no floors above or below the impact points ever move until the structural elements within the impact zone begin to collapse (WTC 7 collapsed differently, which we will cover later).
Furthermore, there are no independent failures present while the structures are collapsing (we’re not talking dust plumes or debris, but actual structural failure). All lower floors remained completely intact until they were consumed by the collapse from above.
Because countless images confirm this assessment and none contradict it, we believe this fact to be visually indisputable.
www.jod911.com/WTC COLLAPSE STUDY BBlanchard 8-8-06.pdf
No. As stated in Section 6.14.4 of NIST NCSTAR 1, the falling mass of the building compressed the air ahead of it—much like the action of a piston—forcing smoke and debris out the windows as the stories below failed sequentially.
These puffs were observed at many locations as the towers collapsed. In all cases, they had the appearance of jets of gas being pushed from the building through windows or between columns on the mechanical floors. Such jets are expected since the air inside the building is compressed as the tower falls and must flow somewhere as the pressure builds. It is significant that similar “puffs” were observed numerous times on the fire floors in both towers prior to their collapses, perhaps due to falling walls or portions of a floor. Puffs from WTC 1 were even observed when WTC 2 was struck by the aircraft. These observations confirm that even minor overpressures were transmitted through the towers and forced smoke and debris from the building.
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
Thermiet is een bepaald mengsel dat een snelle reactie veroorzaakt en verticaal doorbrand. Daar zware kolommen horizontaal met doorbranden is op zijn minst vrij onpraktisch te noemen. Thermiet wordt dan ook nergens ter wereld gebruikt om gebouwen mee op te blazen.
"When they told me there was a hijack, my first reaction was 'Somebody started the exercise early,'" Nasypany later told me. The day's exercise was designed to run a range of scenarios, including a "traditional" simulated hijack in which politically motivated perpetrators commandeer an aircraft, land on a Cuba-like island, and seek asylum. "I actually said out loud, 'The hijack's not supposed to be for another hour,'" Nasypany recalled.
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2006/08/norad200608?currentPage=2
08:37:52
BOSTON CENTER: Hi. Boston Center T.M.U. [Traffic Management Unit], we have a problem here. We have a hijacked aircraft headed towards New York, and we need you guys to, we need someone to scramble some F-16s or something up there, help us out.
POWELL: Is this real-world or exercise?
BOSTON CENTER: No, this is not an exercise, not a test.
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2006/08/norad200608?currentPage=2
116. On 9/11, NORAD was scheduled to conduct a military exercise,Vigilant Guardian, which postulated a bomber attack from the former Soviet Union. We investigated whether military preparations for the large-scale exercise compromised the military's response to the real-world terrorist attack on 9/11. According to General Eber-hart,"it took about 30 seconds" to make the adjustment to the real-world situation. Ralph Eberhart testimony, June 17, 2004.We found that the response was, if anything, expedited by the increased number of staff at the sectors and at NORAD because of the scheduled exercise. See Robert Marr interview (Jan. 23, 2004).
http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/report/911Report_Notes.htm
http://rawstory.com/news/2005/CAUGHT_RED__0923.html
Two SAS soldiers rescued last week after being arrested by Iraqi police and handed over to a militia were engaged in a “secret war” against insurgents bringing sophisticated bombs into the country from Iran.
The men had left their base near the southern Iraqi city of Basra to carry out reconnaissance and supply a second patrol with “more tools and fire power”, said a source with knowledge of their activities.
They had been in Basra for seven weeks on an operation prompted by intelligence that a new type of roadside bomb which has been used against British troops was among weapons being smuggled over the Iranian border.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article570571.ece
Nen tulband op uw kop zetten is nu niet direct hetzelfde als als Al Qaeda verkleed gaan. Zoek ook misschien eens de term "undercoveragent" op.
Since 1988, three Yale graduates have led the United States. George Bush Sr and Bill Clinton both attended the university, though the latter was not tapped to be a Bonesman.Bram Lacor zei:
http://news.scotsman.com/topstories/Election-shows-where-Bones-are.2501726.jp
Power: Today we were running an exercise for a company - bearing in mind I'm now in the private sector - and we sat everybody down, in the city - 1,000 people involved in the whole organisation - but the crisis team. And the most peculiar thing was, we based our scenario on the simultaneous attacks on an underground and mainline station. So we had to suddenly switch an exercise from 'fictional' to 'real'. And one of the first things is, get that bureau number, when you have a list of people missing, tell them. And it took a long time -Bram Lacor zei:
ITV Host: Just to get this right, you were actually working today on an exercise that envisioned virtually this scenario?
Power: Almost precisely. I was up to 2 o'clock this morning, because it's our job, my own company. Visor Consultants, we specialise in helping people to get their crisis management response. How do you jump from 'slow time' thinking to 'quick time' doing? And we chose a scenario - with their assistance - which is based on a terrorist attack because they're very close to a property occupied by Jewish businessmen, they're in the city, and there are more American banks in the city than there are in the whole of New York - a logical thing to do.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKvkhe3rqtc
Een iet of wat gelijkaardige oefening van een privé-bedrijf dus.
September 11 was going to be a busy day at the OEM. Staff members arrived early to prepare for Operation Tripod, an exercise that would test the plan to distribute antibiotics to the entire city population during a bioterrorism attack. The exercise was planned for September 12, with police and fire department cadets to be used as the simulated civilian population. Pier 92 was set up as a model distribution station where the "victims" of the mock attack who needed to receive antibiotics would be treated.Bram Lacor zei:
...
A plan was developed to reestablish OEM's functions at an alternate EOC located in the library of the Police Academy on East 20th Street, but this space was quickly outgrown. Because Pier 92 had already been set up for the September 12 exercise, OEM staff members moved there and quickly converted the space into a large EOC adequate to support the complex tasks of managing the nation's largest catastrophic building collapse. In 31 hours, OEM staff had a functional facility just over 4 miles north-northwest of the WTC.
http://transweb.sjsu.edu/mtiportal/research/publications/documents/Sept11.book.htm#pgfId-1010248
Een oefening gepland voor de volgende dag die hun heeft toegelaten hun reddingswerkzaamheden beter te organiseren. Evil.
Geen flauw idee over wat ge hier zit te zwanzen.Bram Lacor zei:
Ahja, want als iets sterk in twijfel wordt getrokken dat moet het wel niet gebeurt zijn he. Lijk de Holocaust enal.Bram Lacor zei:
Die was normaal.Bram Lacor zei:
WTC 7 was geraakt door het puin van het instortende WTC 1, was zwaar beschadigd en stond in brand.Bram Lacor zei:
Onder "metaal" vallen verschillende elementen, "metaal" heeft dus niet eens een smeltpunt. Om er maar één metaal uit te pikken, aluminium (waar de façade van het WTC mee was bekleed) smelt bij 660 ºC. Zulke temperaturen zijn achteraf in de puinhoop van het WTC gemeten.Bram Lacor zei:
The air ejected from the building by gravitational collapse must have attained, near the ground, the speed of almost 500 mph (or 223 m/s, or 803 km/h) on the average, and fluctuations must have reached the speed of sound. This explains the loud booms...Bram Lacor zei:
http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/p... Did & Did Not Cause It - Revised 3-31-08.pdf
“The towers’ collapse looked exactly like explosive demolitions.”Bram Lacor zei:
PROTEC COMMENT: No they didn’t. It’s the “where.”
When discussing similarities between the towers’ collapse and an explosive demolition, many people overlook the single question most central to any objective investigation. It is not “how” or “when” the buildings failed, but “where” they failed. That answer holds the key to understanding almost everything that occurred at Ground Zero.
Since their inception in the late 1800s, blasting engineers have understood that building implosions work best when the forces of gravity are maximized. This is why blasters always concentrate their efforts on the lowest floors of a structure. While smaller supplemental charges can be placed on upper floors to facilitate breakage and maximize control as the structure collapses, every implosion ever performed has followed the basic model of obliterating structural supports on the bottom few floors first, “to get the structure moving.”
This was not the case with the collapse of Towers 1 and 2. Close examination of these events from every video and photographic angle available does not indicate failure originating from the lowest floors, rather clearly shows each building beginning to fail at precisely the point where the respective planes struck. That is, no floors above or below the impact points ever move until the structural elements within the impact zone begin to collapse (WTC 7 collapsed differently, which we will cover later).
Furthermore, there are no independent failures present while the structures are collapsing (we’re not talking dust plumes or debris, but actual structural failure). All lower floors remained completely intact until they were consumed by the collapse from above.
Because countless images confirm this assessment and none contradict it, we believe this fact to be visually indisputable.
www.jod911.com/WTC COLLAPSE STUDY BBlanchard 8-8-06.pdf
Weren't the puffs of smoke that were seen, as the collapse of each WTC tower starts, evidence of controlled demolition explosions?Bram Lacor zei:
No. As stated in Section 6.14.4 of NIST NCSTAR 1, the falling mass of the building compressed the air ahead of it—much like the action of a piston—forcing smoke and debris out the windows as the stories below failed sequentially.
These puffs were observed at many locations as the towers collapsed. In all cases, they had the appearance of jets of gas being pushed from the building through windows or between columns on the mechanical floors. Such jets are expected since the air inside the building is compressed as the tower falls and must flow somewhere as the pressure builds. It is significant that similar “puffs” were observed numerous times on the fire floors in both towers prior to their collapses, perhaps due to falling walls or portions of a floor. Puffs from WTC 1 were even observed when WTC 2 was struck by the aircraft. These observations confirm that even minor overpressures were transmitted through the towers and forced smoke and debris from the building.
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
Neen.Bram Lacor zei:
Nadat de torens waren ingestort hebben brandweermannen en dergelijke de resterende kolommen doorgebrand om de boel daar te kunnen opruimen. Debiele complottheoristen hebben daar foto's van gezien en "OMG DOORGEBRANDE KOLOMMEN = COMPLOT!!!11111" van gemaakt.Bram Lacor zei:
Thermiet is een bepaald mengsel dat een snelle reactie veroorzaakt en verticaal doorbrand. Daar zware kolommen horizontaal met doorbranden is op zijn minst vrij onpraktisch te noemen. Thermiet wordt dan ook nergens ter wereld gebruikt om gebouwen mee op te blazen.
Een door de overheid geschreven overheidsrapport, shocking! Vertel eerst eens over welk overheidsrapport ge bezig zijt en wijs de gecensureerde pagina's eens aan.Bram Lacor zei:
Fout.Bram Lacor zei:
"When they told me there was a hijack, my first reaction was 'Somebody started the exercise early,'" Nasypany later told me. The day's exercise was designed to run a range of scenarios, including a "traditional" simulated hijack in which politically motivated perpetrators commandeer an aircraft, land on a Cuba-like island, and seek asylum. "I actually said out loud, 'The hijack's not supposed to be for another hour,'" Nasypany recalled.
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2006/08/norad200608?currentPage=2
Fout.Bram Lacor zei:
08:37:52
BOSTON CENTER: Hi. Boston Center T.M.U. [Traffic Management Unit], we have a problem here. We have a hijacked aircraft headed towards New York, and we need you guys to, we need someone to scramble some F-16s or something up there, help us out.
POWELL: Is this real-world or exercise?
BOSTON CENTER: No, this is not an exercise, not a test.
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2006/08/norad200608?currentPage=2
116. On 9/11, NORAD was scheduled to conduct a military exercise,Vigilant Guardian, which postulated a bomber attack from the former Soviet Union. We investigated whether military preparations for the large-scale exercise compromised the military's response to the real-world terrorist attack on 9/11. According to General Eber-hart,"it took about 30 seconds" to make the adjustment to the real-world situation. Ralph Eberhart testimony, June 17, 2004.We found that the response was, if anything, expedited by the increased number of staff at the sectors and at NORAD because of the scheduled exercise. See Robert Marr interview (Jan. 23, 2004).
http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/report/911Report_Notes.htm
In de tien jaar voor 11 september heeft het Amerikaans leger één vliegtuig over land onderschept. Toen deed men er 76 minuten over. De tijd tussen de kaping van AA11 en zijn crash in WTC 1 was 33 minuten, de tijd tussen de kaping van UA175 en zijn crash in WTC 2 was 16 minuten, de tijd tussen de kaping van AA77 en zijn crash in het Pentagon was 41 minuten en de tijd tussen de kaping van UA93 en zijn crash was 35 minuten.Bram Lacor zei:
According to the BBC's Galpin, reporting for BBC Radio 4 (9/20/05, 18 hrs news script), Iraqi police sources in Basra told the BBC the "two British men were arrested after failing to stop at a checkpoint. There was an exchange of gunfire. The men were wearing traditional Arab clothing, and when the police eventually stopped them, they said they found explosives and weapons in their car…It's widely believed the two British servicemen were operating undercover."Bram Lacor zei:
http://rawstory.com/news/2005/CAUGHT_RED__0923.html
Two SAS soldiers rescued last week after being arrested by Iraqi police and handed over to a militia were engaged in a “secret war” against insurgents bringing sophisticated bombs into the country from Iran.
The men had left their base near the southern Iraqi city of Basra to carry out reconnaissance and supply a second patrol with “more tools and fire power”, said a source with knowledge of their activities.
They had been in Basra for seven weeks on an operation prompted by intelligence that a new type of roadside bomb which has been used against British troops was among weapons being smuggled over the Iranian border.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article570571.ece
Nen tulband op uw kop zetten is nu niet direct hetzelfde als als Al Qaeda verkleed gaan. Zoek ook misschien eens de term "undercoveragent" op.
zelfs met bronnen ik moet geluk hebben gehad, want das niet van de gewoonte. :applause: 
