squalleke123 zei:
Die harde bewijzen die je hier aanhaalt zijn gebaseerd op verwoordingen die perfect kunnen uitgelegd worden als iets anders. Dit in tegenstelling tot de uitspraken van Lewinsky of de tapes van Nixon.
Clinton was iets heel anders .
Nixon is gelijkaardig je zou echt eens die tapes moeten beluisteren :
The Smoking Gun Tape
Transcript of the “smoking gun” tape, June 23, 1972.
Haldeman: Okay -that’s fine. Now, on the investigation, you know, the Democratic break-in thing, we’re back to the-in the, the problem area because the FBI is not under control, because Gray doesn’t exactly know how to control them, and they have, their investigation is now leading into some productive areas, because they’ve been able to trace the money, not through the money itself, but through the bank, you know, sources – the banker himself. And, and it goes in some directions we don’t want it to go. Ah, also there have been some things, like an informant came in off the street to the FBI in Miami, who was a photographer or has a friend who is a photographer who developed some films through this guy, Barker, and the films had pictures of Democratic National Committee letter head documents and things. So I guess, so it’s things like that that are gonna, that are filtering in. Mitchell came up with yesterday, and John Dean analyzed very carefully last night and concludes, concurs now with Mitchell’s recommendation that the only way to solve this, and we’re set up beautifully to do it, ah, in that and that…the only network that paid any attention to it last night was NBC…they did a massive story on the Cuban…
Nixon: That’s right.
Haldeman: thing.
Nixon: Right.
Haldeman: That the way to handle this now is for us to have Walters call Pat Gray and just say, “Stay the hell out of this…this is ah, business here we don’t want you to go any further on it.” That’s not an unusual development,…
Nixon: Um huh.
Haldeman: …and, uh, that would take care of it.
Daarover is nixon eigenlijk gevallen die "Uh huh" Dat werd gezien als toestemmen dat men het onderzoek wou beinvloeden.
Een impeachment-procedure houdt politieke risico's in dus zolang men niet zeker is zal men niet tot dergelijke drastische maatregelen overgaan. Er zal dus, IMHO, wel degelijk harder bewijs nodig zijn als dit.
Ze kunnen pas een impeachment-procedure opstarten met een meerderheid en dat hangt af van de GOP. Zolang die blijven trump steunen kan er niks van zodra die ook me zoiets zouden meedoen kan het wel.Meer bewijs maakt weinig uit.
