effe ter info, laatst nog gezegd dat conroe niet de sterkste was als hij zijn cash moet beginnen delen, maar dat hij goed is in game benches en pi. voila hier het resultaat van een niet gecontroleerde intel site met normale benches, geen games.
A Chinese site got hold of one of this Con E6300 chip (1.86 GHZ) and benchmarked it with BAPCo SysMark 2004.
BAPCo SysMark was created by Intel. In July 2002, AMD was allowed to join in its development. SysMark is about doing a bunch of real activities at the same time, mimicking real computer usage. In this test, each core of Conroe will get less cache. Intel had avoided using this benchmark in all the Intel controlled benchmark runs.
In SysMark 2004 test, the Con E6300 got 210 points. In comparison , an Athlon 64 X2 3800+ got 232 points (2/1.86 = 1.07, 232/210=1.1). In Business Winstone 2004, the Con E6300 got a score of 25.2, an Athlon 64 X2 3800+ got 26.2. In Content Creation Winstone 2004, the E6300 got 32.2, the Athlon X2 3800+ got 33.2 (note that WinStone is not a multi-tasking load, it just runs through more memory). Recall that the X2 3800+ has only 512KB L2 cache per core. Suddenly, the Conroe doesn't look so rosy at all. Intel priced this chip lower than X2 3800+ for a good reason.
voor wie de taal kent
http://detail.zol.com.cn/picture_index_51/index500822.shtml
Op welke socket gaat de K8L werken??? (am2 
)