Archief - le_cheater!
Het archief is een bevroren moment uit een vorige versie van dit forum, met andere regels en andere bazen. Deze posts weerspiegelen op geen enkele manier onze huidige ideeën, waarden of wereldbeelden en zijn op sommige plaatsen gecensureerd wegens ontoelaatbaar. Veel zijn in een andere tijdsgeest gemaakt, al dan niet ironisch - zoals in het ironische subforum Off-Topic - en zouden op dit moment niet meer gepost (mogen) worden. Toch bieden we dit archief nog graag aan als informatiedatabank en naslagwerk. Lees er hier meer over of start een gesprek met anderen.
Juve
Legacy Member
uw vergelijking trekt op de balle en slaagt zelfs op nix ...iJsMaNNeTjuH` zei:
en van die lan ebde ni begrepen.
zo is er toch is iets geweest mee goblin die da op ne lan vo de fun had gedaan en thuis was vergeten te deleten, da was toch ook iet van nix
ma kweetni wat en hoe en waarom rhy hiertoe is gekomen, maar ik kan mij bepaalde situaties inbeelden en moest het zo zijn dan zou rhy in mijn achting gestegen zijn, en andere die dan op n bepaalde manier daarop reageren, gedaald zijn. (not that u'd care)
en, wa gade nu doen eigelijk? niemeer tegen em praten? ge deed da prolly toch al nooit ...
oya
Legacy Member
so what als die nu wilt botten, daar et gulle toch geen zakens mee? en hem moet em zekers nie verantwoorden tegen da bendeke "1337" :ironic: zeikers da ier op da forum zitte.
en als uw lief nu nen vibrator koopt omda gij ze nie op aar hoogtepunt kunt krijge, gade dan ook zegge van "OMFG CHEATER"
conclusie:
en als uw lief nu nen vibrator koopt omda gij ze nie op aar hoogtepunt kunt krijge, gade dan ook zegge van "OMFG CHEATER"
conclusie:
|GM|
Legacy Member
From what i can see, people are kind of blind in this topic.
It is a known fact that skynet has dynamic ip-s.
The resolver thingy that someone used to match it to rhy-s IP works the following way:
It sits on IRC and when it sees someone join a channel it saves the IP.
Thing is that of course crexis did not provide... is the time that IP shot was taken,
which is certainly not today, and certainly not for a few months as i have been in Kz for a while and i
didn't find that ip in the log of our private channel.
Although i did find it in another channel...
Guess why?
I wasn't even Kz back then...
From what i saw from a few /who *.adsl.skynet.be* on some networks i made the following conclusion:
Skynet has the following ip-ranges:
if you wish any evidence of that, then you can PM me on IRC
Let's calculate the amount of ip-s for one /16 subnet:
i'll assume that the possibility that rhytm can get that IP again is 455175 to 1...
Of course one would have to also calculate into this estimation the probability he receives that IP exactly within
those 36 hours as skynet disconnects every 36 hours (from what i've heard). This would boost this probability a couple
of million times. Oh and of course you have to calculate the probability that this IP is free.
Skynet has a lot of users so it would include a very complex calculation, of which the probability would be very low.
And the chance that he got that IP again is even smaller...
I've learned this material in secondary school. What about you? Have really all the people on this board never
finished secondary school? Or are they too blind and just SEARCH for cheaters where there are none.
It seems the UT scene is so paranoid that if u have a friend who plays UT and there is a really slim chance he might
have cheated you would turn your back on him directly without even thinking of anything.
Shame on you tbh...
All this useless post proves is that Crexis has been consumed by the paranoia of the UT scene, and is not able to think straight anymore (this is sarcasm btw, before you start flaming me about it). And that it could have been anyone in belgium with a belgian Skynet ADSL connection who cheated on that server.
Hope this clears some things up... and prevents people from posting useless accusations.
But at least i can see now who Rhytm has really owned during his UT career
It's funny
It is a known fact that skynet has dynamic ip-s.
The resolver thingy that someone used to match it to rhy-s IP works the following way:
It sits on IRC and when it sees someone join a channel it saves the IP.
Thing is that of course crexis did not provide... is the time that IP shot was taken,
which is certainly not today, and certainly not for a few months as i have been in Kz for a while and i
didn't find that ip in the log of our private channel.
Although i did find it in another channel...
Guess why?
I wasn't even Kz back then...
I'd say that was quite a while ago...
From what i saw from a few /who *.adsl.skynet.be* on some networks i made the following conclusion:
Skynet has the following ip-ranges:
Perhaps those IP ranges are not entirely owned by skynet but i can say that they are for most part,
if you wish any evidence of that, then you can PM me on IRC
Let's calculate the amount of ip-s for one /16 subnet:
As i previously showed Skynet has at least 7 such subnets... which means
From what i've seen almost any Skynet user can get almost any IP, and i am sure i missed an ip-range or two, so
i'll assume that the possibility that rhytm can get that IP again is 455175 to 1...
Of course one would have to also calculate into this estimation the probability he receives that IP exactly within
those 36 hours as skynet disconnects every 36 hours (from what i've heard). This would boost this probability a couple
of million times. Oh and of course you have to calculate the probability that this IP is free.
Skynet has a lot of users so it would include a very complex calculation, of which the probability would be very low.
If you think of all the probabilities that would apply to this calculation
And the chance that he got that IP again is even smaller...
I've learned this material in secondary school. What about you? Have really all the people on this board never
finished secondary school? Or are they too blind and just SEARCH for cheaters where there are none.
It seems the UT scene is so paranoid that if u have a friend who plays UT and there is a really slim chance he might
have cheated you would turn your back on him directly without even thinking of anything.
Shame on you tbh...
All this useless post proves is that Crexis has been consumed by the paranoia of the UT scene, and is not able to think straight anymore (this is sarcasm btw, before you start flaming me about it). And that it could have been anyone in belgium with a belgian Skynet ADSL connection who cheated on that server.
Hope this clears some things up... and prevents people from posting useless accusations.
But at least i can see now who Rhytm has really owned during his UT career
It's funny
Tyfius
Legacy Member
I can be wrong, but wasn't rhy caught once, a while back ?
I remember someone being caught, and then saying goodbye to the scene and returning a few months later joining kz...
Almost nobody saw this in secondary school. For things like these you take evening courses or choose this topic at a college.
Here in Belgium, secondary school is mostly about an overal view (maths, economics, languages, science, ...) and then (or with some subjects, like electronics, metal, wood, ...) you choose a specification.
oh, and now your calculating, would you mind explaining a few things
- why have some royal members been caught with a different MD5 sum on their skin packages
- why do those MD5 checks correspond to MD5 checks of know brightskins packages
- how you and vader checked those packages and concluded that they are perfectly clear
- more tomorrow, i'm off to bed now
I remember someone being caught, and then saying goodbye to the scene and returning a few months later joining kz...
Almost nobody saw this in secondary school. For things like these you take evening courses or choose this topic at a college.
Here in Belgium, secondary school is mostly about an overal view (maths, economics, languages, science, ...) and then (or with some subjects, like electronics, metal, wood, ...) you choose a specification.
oh, and now your calculating, would you mind explaining a few things
- why have some royal members been caught with a different MD5 sum on their skin packages
- why do those MD5 checks correspond to MD5 checks of know brightskins packages
- how you and vader checked those packages and concluded that they are perfectly clear
- more tomorrow, i'm off to bed now
Het archief is een bevroren moment uit een vorige versie van dit forum, met andere regels en andere bazen. Deze posts weerspiegelen op geen enkele manier onze huidige ideeën, waarden of wereldbeelden en zijn op sommige plaatsen gecensureerd wegens ontoelaatbaar. Veel zijn in een andere tijdsgeest gemaakt, al dan niet ironisch - zoals in het ironische subforum Off-Topic - en zouden op dit moment niet meer gepost (mogen) worden. Toch bieden we dit archief nog graag aan als informatiedatabank en naslagwerk. Lees er hier meer over of start een gesprek met anderen.