Herr_Trigger
Legacy Member
Laat DE discussie van 2004(HL2<>D³) nu maar ophouden.
Is ondertussen wel genoeg geweest.
Vandaar is op Avault een mooie column verschenen over 'The Clash of the Titans':
The battle in 2004 between the blockbusters Doom 3 and Half-Life 2 for the hearts and minds of PC gamers has been of epic proportions. Rarely before in the history of computer gaming have two breakthrough first-person shooters been released in the same year within a few short months of each other. While console gamers head like lemmings for Halo 2 - which despite being inferior to both will doubtlessly sell more than Doom 3 and Half-Life 2 combined - PC shooter fans look with downright disdain at this pretender to a throne they know only can reside on the mouse-keyboard oriented personal computer. Like so many others, I have played through Doom 3 and Half-Life 2, arguably the two best first-person shooters ever released, and a lot of thoughts bubbled up about comparisons between the two, as both raise the bar in different ways. The purpose of this article is neither to express lots of mindless hype (as some of the published reviews did) nor even to decide which of the two is better, but rather to show what the similarities and differences are in the single-player experiences (I have conveniently excluded multiplayer since this was clearly not the focus of either release).
lees:
http://www.avault.com/articles/getarticle.asp?name=titans
Zeer aangenaam om es dooruit te lezen en ik ken niemand die het dit jaar beter heeft uitgedrukt.
Wees idd blij dat we zoiets kunnen beleven op onze luie stoel! Ten tijde van commodore64 bv had ik zoiets enkel kunnen dromen. Et voila! En toch nog mensen die blijven kritiek spuien. Volgens mij vooral degenen die met 'geavanceerde' 3d games zijn opgegroeid.
Ten tijde van 2d was een gravgun-toestand-puzzel bv
nog onmogelijk/ in niemand opgekomen.
Of per pixel lighting.
Read the column!
ps: dit zou natuurlijk ook op HL2-forum mogen staan, maar way to lazy.
Is ondertussen wel genoeg geweest.
Vandaar is op Avault een mooie column verschenen over 'The Clash of the Titans':
The battle in 2004 between the blockbusters Doom 3 and Half-Life 2 for the hearts and minds of PC gamers has been of epic proportions. Rarely before in the history of computer gaming have two breakthrough first-person shooters been released in the same year within a few short months of each other. While console gamers head like lemmings for Halo 2 - which despite being inferior to both will doubtlessly sell more than Doom 3 and Half-Life 2 combined - PC shooter fans look with downright disdain at this pretender to a throne they know only can reside on the mouse-keyboard oriented personal computer. Like so many others, I have played through Doom 3 and Half-Life 2, arguably the two best first-person shooters ever released, and a lot of thoughts bubbled up about comparisons between the two, as both raise the bar in different ways. The purpose of this article is neither to express lots of mindless hype (as some of the published reviews did) nor even to decide which of the two is better, but rather to show what the similarities and differences are in the single-player experiences (I have conveniently excluded multiplayer since this was clearly not the focus of either release).
lees:
http://www.avault.com/articles/getarticle.asp?name=titans
Zeer aangenaam om es dooruit te lezen en ik ken niemand die het dit jaar beter heeft uitgedrukt.
Wees idd blij dat we zoiets kunnen beleven op onze luie stoel! Ten tijde van commodore64 bv had ik zoiets enkel kunnen dromen. Et voila! En toch nog mensen die blijven kritiek spuien. Volgens mij vooral degenen die met 'geavanceerde' 3d games zijn opgegroeid.
Ten tijde van 2d was een gravgun-toestand-puzzel bv
nog onmogelijk/ in niemand opgekomen.
Of per pixel lighting.
Read the column!
ps: dit zou natuurlijk ook op HL2-forum mogen staan, maar way to lazy.
doe eens niet zo vijandig tegen elkaar 
), toen ik zocht achter info heb ik echt niets pro windows gevonden.
:doh: 