Peephole
Legacy Member
Twee filmpjes waar je duidelijk ziet dat die rook uit het WTC 7 komt.Bacon zei:Duh, de rook heeft helemaal niets met het gebouw te maken en is afkomstig van de andere gebouwen, het lijkt alleen zo omdat de wind er voor zorgt dat er een aflijning ontstaat aan het gebouw. Fake foto's om mensen blaaskes wijs te maken. M'n goesting om verder te lezen is al over.
http://www.911myths.com/WTC7_Smoke.avi
http://www.911myths.com/wtc7moresmoke.avi
En wat zeggen de brandweermannen?
Boyle: On the north and east side of 7 it didn’t look like there was any damage at all, but then you looked on the south side of 7 there had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors. Debris was falling down on the building and it didn’t look good.
Firehouse: When you looked at the south side, how close were you to the base of that side?
Boyle: I was standing right next to the building, probably right next to it.
Firehouse: When you had fire on the 20 floors, was it in one window or many?
Boyle: There was a huge gaping hole and it was scattered throughout there. It was a huge hole. I would say it was probably about a third of it, right in the middle of it. And so after Visconti came down and said nobody goes in 7, we said all right, we’ll head back to the command post. We lost touch with him. I never saw him again that day.
http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/magazine/gz/boyle.html
Hayden: Also we were pretty sure that 7 World Trade Center would collapse. Early on, we saw a bulge in the southwest corner between floors 10 and 13, and we had put a transit on that and we were pretty sure she was going to collapse. You actually could see there was a visible bulge, it ran up about three floors. It came down about 5 o’clock in the afternoon, but by about 2 o’clock in the afternoon we realized this thing was going to collapse.
Firehouse: Was there heavy fire in there right away?
Hayden: No, not right away, and that’s probably why it stood for so long because it took a while for that fire to develop. It was a heavy body of fire in there and then we didn’t make any attempt to fight it. That was just one of those wars we were just going to lose. We were concerned about the collapse of a 47-story building there. We were worried about additional collapse there of what was remaining standing of the towers and the Marriott, so we started pulling the people back after a couple of hours of surface removal and searches along the surface of the debris. We started to pull guys back because we were concerned for their safety."
http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/magazine/gz/hayden.html
Oei, wat nu?The next thing I did was we saw a fire starting to show at windows in 7 World Trade Center, decided to go in and try and see if there was anybody in the building and/or put out the fires, and we did a search from floor to floor of 7 World Trade Center passing fire on floors 3, 7, 9. The standpipes had no water. We tried to extinguish a few fires with cans. When we got to 11, there was just too much smoke and we decided that, without water, if we went any higher, we'd be on fool's mission.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110462.PDF
Wat is in godsnaam een natuurlijke val van een wolkenkrabber?Bacon zei:Niet 100% symetrisch maar zeker niet iets dat op een "natuurlijke" val lijkt, let ook op de afwezigheid van vuur...



